Introduction

We have three topologies regarding hosting models:

  1. Most workloads are deployed and managed on our cloud.

  2. Most workloads are deployed and managed on the customer's premise.

  3. Hybrid setup where some components are installed on the customer's premise that send anonymized and pre-processed data to Dsquares cloud.

1. Most workloads are deployed and managed on our cloud.

Pros:

  • Scalability: Easily scale resources up or down depending on demand, without worrying about physical hardware.

  • Cost Efficiency: Pay-as-you-go model can be more cost-effective, especially for varying workloads.

  • Security: GCP offers robust security features, including encryption, identity management, and compliance with global standards.

  • Maintenance: Reduced need for in-house maintenance since GCP handles most of the infrastructure management.

  • Innovation: Easy access to advanced GCP services like AI, machine learning, and data analytics.

  • High Availability: GCP’s global infrastructure ensures high availability and redundancy.

  • Faster Deployment: Rapid deployment of services and applications without the need for physical infrastructure setup.

Cons:

  • Data Sovereignty: Some customers may have concerns about data being stored off-premises, especially in highly regulated industries.

  • Latency: Depending on the geographical location of users, there could be latency issues compared to an on-premises solution.

  • Control: Less control over the physical infrastructure and hardware configurations.

2. Most workloads are deployed and managed on the customer's premise

Pros:

  • Control: Complete control over the entire infrastructure, including hardware, software, and security configurations.

  • Data Sovereignty: Ensures that all data remains on-site, which may be crucial for compliance with local regulations.

  • Latency: Reduced latency as the infrastructure is located on the customer’s premises.

  • Customization: Greater flexibility to customize the hardware and software stack according to specific needs.

Cons:

  • Cost: Higher upfront capital expenditure for hardware, software, and infrastructure setup. Ongoing costs for maintenance, power, and cooling can also be significant.

  • Scalability: Scaling up requires purchasing and installing additional hardware, which can be time-consuming and expensive.

  • Maintenance: Requires dedicated IT staff for managing, maintaining, and securing the infrastructure.

  • Disaster Recovery: Requires robust disaster recovery plans and infrastructure, which can be costly to implement.

  • Timeline Impact: On-premises deployment will likely extend project timelines due to the time needed for procurement, installation, and configuration of physical infrastructure.

3. Hybrid setup where some components are installed on the customer's premise that send anonymized and pre-processed data to Dsquares cloud

Pros:

  • Flexibility: Combines the best of both worlds by keeping sensitive data on-premises while leveraging the cloud for processing and storage.

  • Cost Efficiency: Reduce costs by offloading some workloads to the cloud while keeping critical applications on-premises.

  • Scalability: The cloud component allows for easy scaling when needed without over-provisioning on-premises hardware.

  • Data Sovereignty: Sensitive data can be processed and stored on-premises, while less critical data can be moved to the cloud.

Cons:

  • Complexity: Managing and integrating both on-premises and cloud environments can be complex and may require specialized skills.

  • Security: While offering flexibility, it can also create security challenges in ensuring consistent security policies across both environments.

  • Cost: While potentially reducing costs, managing two environments could lead to higher operational expenses.

  • Latency: Data transfer between on-premises and cloud environments could introduce latency, especially for real-time applications.

  • Timeline Impact: Like on-premises, hybrid setups can also stretch timelines due to the need for integration between on-premises infrastructure and cloud services.

Conclusion:

Cloud Hosting on GCP at our end and the hybrid model remains the preferred models for its scalability, efficiency, and speed of deployment.

Last updated